- View All News
- March 2012
- December 2010
- September 2010
- May 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
Cancer Victors News
December 29, 2009
1. Canned Tomatoes
The expert: Fredrick vom Saal, PhD, an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri who studies bisphenol-A
The resin linings of tin cans contain bisphenol-A, a synthetic estrogen that has been linked to ailments ranging from reproductive problems to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. Acidity -- a prominent characteristic of tomatoes -- causes BPA to leach into your food.
2. Corn-Fed Beef
The expert: Joel Salatin, co-owner of Polyface Farms and author of books on sustainable farming
Cattle were designed to eat grass, not grains. But farmers today feed their animals corn and soybeans, which fatten up the animals faster for slaughter. A recent comprehensive study found that compared with corn-fed beef, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E, omega-3s, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), calcium, magnesium, and potassium.
3. Microwave Popcorn
The expert: Olga Naidenko, PhD, a senior scientist for the Environmental Working Group
Chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), in the lining of the bag, are part of a class of compounds that may be linked to infertility in humans. In animal testing, the chemicals cause liver, testicular, and pancreatic cancer. Studies show that microwaving causes the chemicals to vaporize -- and migrate into your popcorn.
4. Nonorganic Potatoes
The expert: Jeffrey Moyer, chair of the National Organic Standards Board
Root vegetables absorb herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides that wind up in soil. In the case of potatoes they're treated with fungicides during the growing season, then sprayed with herbicides to kill off the fibrous vines before harvesting. After they're dug up, the potatoes are treated yet again to prevent them from sprouting.
5. Farmed Salmon
The expert: David Carpenter, MD, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany
Nature didn't intend for salmon to be crammed into pens and fed soy, poultry litter, and hydrolyzed chicken feathers. As a result, farmed salmon is lower in vitamin D and higher in contaminants, including carcinogens, PCBs, brominated flame retardants, and pesticides such as dioxin and DDT.
6. Milk Produced with Artificial Hormones
The expert: Rick North, project director of the Campaign for Safe Food at the Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Milk producers treat their dairy cattle with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH or rBST, as it is also known) to boost milk production. But rBGH also increases udder infections and even pus in the milk. It also leads to higher levels of a hormone called insulin-like growth factor in milk. In people, high levels of IGF-1 may contribute to breast, prostate, and colon cancers.
7. Conventional Apples
The expert: Mark Kastel, codirector of the Cornucopia Institute
If fall fruits held a "most doused in pesticides contest," apples would win. And increasing numbers of studies are starting to link a higher body burden of pesticides with Parkinson's disease.
This is one of the best “foods to avoid” lists I’ve seen come out of the mainstream media. It is very rare when this happens, but I agree with every food on this list.
The reality is that most food nowadays is far from pure. Pesticide residues have been detected in 50 percent to 95 percent of all commercially grown U.S. foods, and that is only one type of toxin.
Babies are actually born toxic due to the toxic load of their mothers, some of which comes from dietary contaminants and food additives. One study by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that blood samples from newborns contained an average of 287 toxins, including mercury, fire retardants, pesticides, and Teflon chemicals!
The list above is a great starting point to cleaning up your diet, but focusing on organically grown, biodynamic whole foods is really the key to success here.
I want to expand on some of the toxic foods mentioned above, as well as add a few more to the list, so you can significantly reduce your exposure to toxins in the foods you eat.
Why Fresh is Better Than Canned
Many leading brands of canned foods contain BPA -- a toxic chemical linked to reproductive abnormalities, neurological effects, heightened risk of breast and prostate cancers, diabetes, heart disease and other serious health problems.
According to Consumer Reports’ testing, just a couple of servings of canned food can exceed the safety limits for daily BPA exposure for children.
The current US federal guidelines put the daily upper limit of “safe” exposure at 50 micrograms of BPA per kilogram of body weight. You should know, however, that even low-level exposure to BPA can be hazardous to your health, and Consumer Reports’ testing found that eating popular canned foods may expose you to excessive amounts of BPA:
- Del Monte Fresh Cut Green Beans had BPA levels ranging from 35.9 ppb to as much as 191 ppb
- Progresso Vegetable Soup had BPA levels ranging from 67 to 134 ppb
- Campbell’s Condensed Chicken Noodle Soup had BPA levels ranging from 54.5 to 102 ppb
So, ideally avoid canned foods entirely and stick to fresh fruits and vegetables, or switch over to brands that use glass containers instead.
Grass-Fed is the Healthy Choice for Beef
Grass-fed beef is vastly superior to grain-fed beef, and in fact it’s the clear beef of choice you should be eating. It is far more important to choose grass-fed than to choose organic, as most grass-fed beef are also organic
Not only is it raised in a more sustainable way for the environment and a more humane way for the animal, but it’s the superior choice for your health.
Grass-fed beef, for instance, is lower in fat than regular beef and, more importantly, contains higher amounts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), a fatty acid. Grass-fed animals have from three to five times more CLA than grain-fed animals.
CLA has been making headlines for its extreme health benefits, which include:
- Fighting cancer and diabetes
- Helping you lose weight
- Increasing your metabolic rate, a positive benefit for promoting normal thyroid function
- Helping you maintain normal cholesterol and triglyceride levels
- Enhancing your immune system
Keep in mind that grass-fed meat is almost always preferable to certified organic meat also because most organic beef is fed organic corn, which is what causes the myriad of health problems associated with eating beef. If you can find organic, grass-fed meat, that would be ideal.
What You Need to Know About Milk
I strongly recommend you avoid milk that has the added growth hormone rBGH.
Samuel Epstein, MD, a scientist at the University of Illinois School of Public Health, is one of the top experts on cancer prevention, and he has been speaking out against rBGH in milk, the so-called “crack for cows,” for years.
For starters, Dr. Epstein points out that rBGH milk is “supercharged with high levels of a natural growth factor (IGF-1), excess levels of which have been incriminated as major causes of breast, colon, and prostate cancers.”
But that’s not all.
"This milk is qualitatively and quantitatively different from natural milk," states Dr. Epstein. "In addition to the issue of increased IGF-1 levels, these differences include:
- Contamination of milk by the GM hormone rBGH
- Contamination by pus and antibiotics resulting from the high incidence of mastitis in rBGH-injected cows
- Contamination with illegal antibiotics and drugs used to treat mastitis and other rBGH-induced disease
- Increased concentration of the thyroid hormone enzyme thyroxin-5'-monodeiodinase
- Increased concentration of long-chain and decreased concentration of short-chain fatty acids
- A reduction in levels of the milk protein casein."
You very well may be drinking rBGH milk and not know it, as no labels are required. This is despite the fact that nearly every American wants it labeled, but the government, as usual, bowed to industry lobbyists and, amazingly, does not require this on the label.
However, as increasing numbers of people and dairies choose to avoid rBGH, you can find labels that say “rBGH-free” or a similar variation. Organic milk is also rBGH-free.
This is certainly preferable to milk that contains this dangerous hormone … but I still don’t recommend drinking any milk, organic or otherwise, that is pasteurized.
You can avoid both the risks of rBGH and pasteurization by only drinking raw milk that comes from a small farmer you know and trust. This is the only way to drink milk if you’re interested in protecting your health.
The Most Important Foods to Buy Organic
Most fruits and vegetables contain unacceptable and unsafe levels of pesticides, so it’s a wise choice to buy organic produce as often as you can.
However, if you need to pick and choose which foods to buy organic, the most important foods to buy organic are animal products -- not produce. This is because animal foods, which are raised on pesticide-laced feed, tend to have higher concentrations of pesticides.
Non-organic meats have up to five times more pesticides than non-organic vegetables.
Non-organic butter can have up to 20 times as many pesticides as non-organic vegetables.
So when prioritizing your purchases, look for organic meats, eggs and dairy products before anything else.
There is one exception to this rule, and that is you may be better off choosing fresh local foods over organic foods. Often, locally grown foods are raised according to organic standards at a more affordable price.
Is Farmed Salmon the Only Seafood to Avoid?
Farmed salmon is among the worst seafood choices out there, as numerous studies show the salmon contain toxins and cancer-causing pollutants. Farmed salmon typically have at least 10 times more cancer-causing persistent organic pollutants than their wild counterparts.
That said, I do not agree that farmed salmon is the only fish you need to stay away from.
A recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey detected mercury in every fish sampled from nearly 300 U.S. streams. Among them, 27 percent contained mercury at levels that equaled or exceeded the U.S. EPA’s criterion for the protection of human health, and more than two-thirds exceeded mercury safety levels for fish-eating mammals like mink and otters.
Therefore, I do not recommend eating any fish -- whether farm-raised or from an ocean, lake, river or stream -- unless you have lab results in your hand that can attest to its purity.
There are still some safe areas out there, such as in certain pristine waters in Alaska, but it will take some searching on your end to seek them out. The ONLY safe fish I have discovered so far is Vital Choice wild red salmon, which remains the only source of fish I’ll eat.
Eating smaller fish, like anchovies and sardines, is also an option, as their small size makes them far less likely to be contaminated.
An important point to remember if you’re not eating fish is that your body still has a requirement for omega-3 fats. Fortunately, you can easily meet your omega-3 needs by taking a high-quality krill oil supplement, instead of risking your health by eating contaminated fish.
Another Food to Avoid: Unfermented Soy
This one did not make the above list, but it’s one I would definitely add.
Any soy that is unfermented -- soy milk, tofu, soybean oil, soy burgers, and all the other processed soy products out there all belong to this category -- is not a health food and in fact is not a food I would advise eating at all. This is true whether it is “organic” or not.
Soy infant formula is also on this list and is one of the absolute worst foods you can give your baby.
Unfermented soy products have been linked to everything from reproductive disorders and infertility to cancer and heart disease.
Further, unfermented soy contains isoflavones that are clearly associated with reduced thyroid function. Eating unfermented soy products is likely the single largest cause of hypothyroidism in women.
Another major problem with unfermented soy is that it contains natural toxins known as “antinutrients.” This includes a large quantity of inhibitors that deter your enzymes needed for protein digestion.
While a small amount of these antinutrients would likely not be a problem, the amount of soy that many Americans are now eating (and drinking in the form of soy milk) is quite significant.
The result of consuming too many of soy’s antinutrients is extensive gastric distress and chronic deficiencies in amino acid uptake, which can result in pancreatic impairment and cancer.
For more details on soy foods, including the fermented varieties that can actually be healthy, please read Why This Type of Soy is Better.
Guidelines for Healthy Food
Whatever food you’re looking to eat, whether imported organic or locally grown, from either your local supermarket or a farmer’s market, here are the signs of a high-quality, healthy food:
- It’s grown without pesticides and chemical fertilizers (organic foods fit this description, but so do some non-organic foods)
- It’s not genetically modified
- It contains no added growth hormones, antibiotics, or other drugs
- It does not contain artificial anything, nor any preservatives
- It is fresh (if you have to choose between wilted organic produce or fresh conventional produce, the latter may be the better option)
- It did not come from a factory farm
- It is grown with the laws of nature in mind (meaning animals are fed their native diets, not a mix of grains and animal byproducts, and have free-range access to the outdoors)
- It is grown in a sustainable way (using minimal amounts of water, protecting the soil from burnout, and turning animal wastes into natural fertilizers instead of environmental pollutants)
If the food meets these criteria, it is likely a good choice. Most often, the best place to find these foods is from a sustainable agricultural group in your area. You can also review my free nutrition plan to get started on a healthy eating program today.
Posted 12/29/2009 12:08:00 PM
December 8, 2009
Posted 12/8/2009 12:10:00 PM
December 8, 2009
XYZ-Wellbeing ReTreat Facility are the only people who have experience in this IV Therapy. It is wrong and can be dangerous to do this therapy with-out a skilled person assisting you. These above specialists have the benefits of my many 40 years experience in the field of Cancer and specializing with what I believe is the best, High PH therapy.
DrPablo at a new clinic opening early in 2009 www.XYZ-Wellbeing.com Dr Pablo heads up the team in a new six year Cancer Trial On Alternative Treatments in Combination. They run for the FIRST 21 DAYS of each month commencing with a weekend workshop the first Saturday of each month. This is a holistic combination that will give you the best possible outcome using these therapies.
Stage 1 has a detoxing and strengthening preparation program for 21 days, & Ozone. Stage 2 Followed by Dr Sartori Ozone and High PH Program month 2 over 21 days. Stage 3 A Recharge and rebuild program that included very high Vitamin C, Hyperbaric Oxygen, Colonic Irrigation, Immune stimulants, just to name a few of the services.
With a relaxing pampering week in between with organic food, massage and many qualified Alternative Practitioners and supportive staff, this clinic is unique.
The programs at XYZ-Wellbeing.com include Ozone, Vitamin B17, also referred to as laetrile, Enzyme Therapy, Vit C for Cancer & Detoxing and or wellness enhancement programs every day, as well as mind therapy and meditation.
Please read all of the Dr Sartori Papers
and only use this program with a supportive practitioner as like all therapies,
side effects can be dangerous,
for example: you can even drown with to much water.
These minerals, Ozone and the holistic approach, when combined carefully
using Dr Sartori s formula, is safe.
However in the wrong combination or hands can be dangerous.
Part 1 HOW TO TURN CANCER INTO A NEW LEASE ON LIFE
I am proud to announce that the Enhanced High-pH Therapy of Cancer
originally conceived by the world-famous bio and nuclear physicistA. Keith Brewer, Ph. D. and
enhanced by the undersigned
is once again available through www.XYZ-Wellbeing.com ReTreat Facility
This cancer therapy is based on Natures way of getting rid of cancer. It simulates the life condition of the longevity populations of this world, all of which seem to have many factors in common. These people, many of which live well over 120 years in excellent health, are almost exclusively found in high altitudes of 2000 m (7000 ft) and above. They breathe clean air enriched with tiny amounts of ozone. They drink pure mountain water that flows right of the glaciers. They grow their own food that is rich in vitamins and minerals. Their stress level is low and they are in harmony with their environment.
Their spiritual beliefs demand from them to respect all other living beings. It is interesting to note that of the three people with the greatest longevity, two – the Hunzas in Northern Pakistan, and the Abkhazians in the Caucasian Mountains of Georgia near the Black Sea – are devout Muslims, the third, in Vilcabamba, Ecuador, mostly follow Native American Indian animistic beliefs.The first unusual ingredient of the environment of the longevity population – ozone is highly activated oxygen consisting of three atoms. This triatomic oxygen is the most powerful purifier of the Earth and of all living beings. In the simplest terms, ozone is capable of burning all poisonous substances at temperatures between 10 to 40 degrees Celsius (50 to 104 degrees Fahrenheit), as well as killing all bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms that may contribute to cancers.
Ozone is produced by the action of ultraviolet sun light on the oxygen in the air. The higher up we go, the more ultraviolet, and thus, the more ozone. Since time immemorial, it was known that women, who grew up in lowlands, would not get pregnant for at least six months if they moved to altitudes of 3600 m (12000 ft.) or higher. We believe now that ozone naturally prevents a pregnancy until these women are fully acclimatized to high altitudes. In the same way, as ozone temporarily stops the growth of the embryo, it also stops the growth of any fast growing cancer.
We know from the research of Prof. Dr. Otto von Warburg in the 1920s that the cancer cell acts like a plant cell and is dependent for its energy metabolism on lactic fermentation. Fermentation is 19 times less effective than oxidation, the normal energy metabolism of the entire animal kingdom. Fermentation is very sensitive to minute amounts of ozone and there are virtually no cancers observed in people living in altitudes above 2100 m (7000 ft.).
All longevity populations live on a diet rich in certain vitamins and minerals that have been proven effective in preventing cancer. Most important among these nutrients are vitamin C (ascorbic acid and ascorbates), vitamin A (retinoic acid and derivatives) and beta-carotene, vitamin E (mixed tocopherols), vitamin D2 from UV irradiation of ergosterol, the high-pH minerals cesium (Cs), rubidium (Rb), and potassium (K), and the trace minerals zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), molybdenum (Mo), and vanadium (V). These nutrients are found in the home-grown vegetables and fruits that are mostly eaten within a few hours after they are harvested. Needless to say, they are grown organically, without the use of harsh chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Most of the drinking water is glacier run-off, called milk of the mountains that is rich in rubidium and cesium. Magnesium (Mg), with calcium (Ca), essential for the transport of oxygen into cells, and potassium (K) with Mg, the most important intracellular electrolytes, are abundant both in green vegetables and drinking water consumed by longevity populations. It is interesting to note that most longevity populations go through prolonged periods of fasts on a yearly basis, be it during the month of Ramadan or during the leaner part of the year before the crops are harvested.
If ozone in higher doses is applied intravenously, it is effective not only to prevent cancer, but to reverse many cancers, especially cancers of the lungs, liver, pancreas, and metastatic cancers to the bone, as is well documented in the medical literature. Doctor A.K. Brewerâs high-pH therapy, using high doses of cesium (or rubidium), and enhanced by weak acids such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and retinoic acid (derived from vitamin A) , as well as ampholytic elements such as zinc and selenium, has been proven effective in virtually all fast growing cancers, both after oral and intravenous application. This is further enhanced by amilonitriles contained in apricot pits that are part of the regular diet of the Hunzas, and may also be applied intravenously in the form of Laetrile.
The intravenous form of the enhanced high-pH therapy also contains generous amounts of the intracellular electrolytes magnesium and potassium. The dosage of the I.V. therapy is adjusted to reduce virtually all smaller cancer accumulations (up to 20 or 30 cm diameter), providing that they are fast growing tumors, by one to two centimeters per day (2/5 to 4/5 per day). Large tumor masses are reduced with the I.V. therapy by 500 to 900 grams per day (1 to 2 lbs. /day) to prevent an over-loading of the bodies metabolism and excretion with tumor breakdown products. The critical factor is the kidney and liver function of the cancer patient before the enhanced high-pH therapy is started. One important thing to keep in kind is that, though the enhanced high-pH therapy was seemingly effective, some patients may still succumb from the adverse effects of cancer chemotherapy, or from complications of radiation or surgery undergone previously. Also, if a cancer patient, after the tumor disappeared with the high pH therapy, does not change his lifestyle and eating habits, cancers may develop again in his or her body.
How does all of this work?
Most orthodox cancer chemotherapy proffers only a large number of unproven theories and in almost all cases shortens the survival after severe suffering form its adverse effects1. On the other hand, the enhanced high-pH cancer therapy is proven effective by clinical and experimental studies that filled over two thirds of Supplement 1, to the major peer-reviewed medical journal Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, of December 1984 [21 Suppl 1: 1-135]2.
Also, on this therapy, almost all patients, no matter how far gone or suffering from the adverse effects of chemotherapy and/or radiation, will feel much better within a few days. Particularly, cancer pain, even if unresponsive to the most powerful pain killers, in most cases disappears within only a few hours after starting the cesium.
Any symptoms connected with this therapy, particularly from the I.V. ozone, are almost always the result of a healing crisis, well known to homeopaths for over 200 years. These symptoms may be quite uncomfortable but subside in most cases within a few hours, and many patients report that afterwards they felt better then ever before in their lives.
1 See Appendix II to the author’s two Cancer Articles: “Nutrients & Cancer” and “Cesium Therapy in Cancer Patients”, Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1984; Suppl 1: 7-10 & 11-3, respectively.
2 See Appendix I to and also the author’s two Cancer Articles of 1984.
In the following we will briefly explain how cancers form (i.e., carcinogenesis) and how the enhanced high-pH cancer therapy transforms cancer cells either to normal cells or makes them disappear altogether.
Professor Dr. Otto von Warburg, double Nobel laureate, in medicine and biochemistry, in the 1920s discovered the fundamental mechanism of carcinogenesis. When certain cancer-causing chemicals (carcinogens) attach to the cell membrane, the oxygen carriers calcium and magnesium are unable to enter these cells. The resulting oxygen starvation causes these cells to regress to anaerobic (i.e., without oxygen) metabolism [which is 19 times less effective than aerobic (with oxygen) metabolism, as was stated previously].
The end product of anaerobic breakdown of glucose is lactic acid which renders the cell acidic. This acidosis, in turn, causes the genetic changes that result in the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells. The pH in cancer cells, because of the lactic acid buildup, lowers from about 7.2 to 7.0 (in fast growing tissues) to between 6.8 and 6.0, and in some fast growing metastases to even 5.5. This renders cancer cells extremely vulnerable to ozone and alkalinity which, if applied in minute amounts, either normalizes or destroys them.
Specifically, intravenous ozone has the four major effects in cancer patients.
One, it removes homeopathically whatever disposed a specific organism to cancer and this causes the healing crisis. This healing crisis may be quite uncomfortable subjectively (though lasting at most a few hours), but there is less than a one in a million chance of serious complications.
Two, ozone removes all toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, amoebas, viruses, bacteria, and other agents from the body that may in some way contribute to cancer and this may be the reason why it seems to be cancer preventative.
Three, ozone inhibits any fast and uncontrolled growth typical for cancer cells.
And four, ozone has a well documented immuno-stimulating effect that helps both with the protection from cancer and with the removal of cancer cells destroyed by the high-pH therapy, enhances the body’s resistance to infections, and boosts longevity.
The more acidic the cancer cells, i.e., the lower their pH, the more vulnerable they are to alkaline, or high-pH, agents. While normal cells are not permeable for cesium or rubidium, and require a transport mechanism for potassium, these three alkalizing elements freely diffuse into cancer cells. This causes the pH to raise in cancer cell; and the higher the pH in the cancer cells, the faster the cancer breaks down. If the intracellular pH is raised to above 8.5, you can actually see the skin wrinkle while you watch over areas where there previously was a superficial cancer tumor, e.g., a breast cancer.
This diffusion of alkalizing elements is enhanced by ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and retinoic acid (from vitamin A). Zinc and selenium further enhance the penetration of cesium, etc., by broadening the electron donor capacity of the cell membrane. Zinc and selenium are also powerful immunostimulants, and help with the removal of tumor cells by phagocytotic (lit. cell-eating) neutrophil leukocytes (white blood cells) and monocytes (also called macrophages or â big cell-eaters). Selenium, vitamin E, and beta-carotene are powerful antioxidantts that scavenge dangerous free radicals. Vitamin E also prevents the toxicity of high doses of vitamin A. Molybdenum enhances cancer-destroying oxidases, and vanadium assists with lipid and fatty aid metabolism for faster breakdown of cancers.
What is the reality of the 2004 State of the Cancer Treatment in the U.S.A.?
After 35 years of war-on-cancer, and almost $ 90 billion of research funding by the U.S. Government, the cancer death rate in the U.S. of A. increased almost six-fold from 145,000 in 1970, to an estimated 850,000 for 2004. Each insured cancer patient is presently worth between $ 150,000 to $ 500,000 (average about $ 200,000) to the medical profession, hospitals, and the pharmaceutical industry. The out of pocket expenses for insured patients range from $ 30,000 to 100,000, average about $ 40,000, whereas the ULS Cancer Therapy is offered at $ 16,000.00 / â‚¬14,000.00. The total national expenditure for cancer management to the premature death of over 800,000 people per year exceeds $ 100,000,000 ($ 100 billion), and, in addition, there are economic losses of the families of the prematurely deceased of perhaps $ 120 billion if their lives had been saved by effective alternative therapies.
This total financial investment for patients undergoing the enhanced high-pH cancer therapy is about one-half to one-tenth of the out of pocket expenses of the average insured cancer victim undergoing conventional orthodox cancer therapies. Best of all, the success rate with the enhanced high-pH therapy is consistently much higher and in many cases over 95%, particularly if you are not suffering from severe toxicity of chemotherapy or from radiation damages. And this includes proven incurable (i.e., by orthodox therapies) cancers of the lungs, liver, pancreas, brain, prostate, breast, bones, melanomas, lymphomas, sarcomas, and leukemias.
Because of the potential (especially, financial) impact of the enhanced high-pH therapy on the medical/hospital/pharmaceutical industry complex and their most powerful lobby in Washington, D.C., and in many State Governments, this effective, economical, non-toxic treatment can only be offered offshore, i.e., at a location outside the United States. However, every effort is made to have these offshore hospitals properly accredited and to have the costs of the treatments reimbursed by most insurance carriers. The first of these locations is now available in Northern Thailand at a first class hospital for Alternative Medicines that, Inshaâ€™Allah, will be upgraded to the point that it is eligible for Blue Cross insurance payments. (Added update) and also at XYZ Wellbeing ReTreat Facility and Research Cancer Centre in Located in the the beautiful Cartagena South America. Visit www.xyz-wellbeing.com and go to the why choose us link for more cesium information and cancer research.
Therefore, if you, or any of your loved-ones or friends have cancer, even if it was so far ân incurable with chemo, radiation, and/or surgery, please contact The above to see if you may be eligible for the enhanced high-pH therapy. We are committed to one thing only ând to return you to your mental, emotional, and spiritual wellbeing. As long as you faithfully follow the path that we map out for you, you have an excellent chance of emulating the joyous, vigorous longevity of the people who served as the models for the enhanced high-pH therapy. However, it cannot be stressed enough, that the shrinking of a tumor is by far the lesser part of overcoming cancer.
Much more important for lasting success is to overcome the cancer personality, defined in the 1960s by Lawrence LeShan, and to embark on an overall healthy lifestyle that equals and excels (by more advanced knowledge) the one the longevity populations. And, perhaps, most important is your will to live and your absolute need to have to accomplish things that must not be left undone by your premature death from cancer. By taking charge of your life in this manner and by taking responsibility by following our leads in all aspects of your life, you will make it possible not only to become free of cancer but remain free of it permanently.
We can only lead you to the Path.
It is up to you to walk it and to make sure that everyone around you walks it with you and all the way!
No matter what, always keep in kind that, fundamentally, the Lord wills the ultimate outcome of everything in your life. Just as the Lord lead you to the enhanced high-pH therapy to get rid of your cancer tumor, and to the comprehensive Ultralifescience Program for physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual wellbeing, the extent to which you will succeed with it is entirely as the Lord wills. Our promise to you is simply that we will leave no stone unturned to provide for you all the tools for your success in this endeavor.
To your abiding health, vigor, and happiness!
Abdul-Haqq H.E. Sartori, M.D.
NOW THAT YOU HAVE LEARNED THAT YOU HAVE TERMINAL / INCURABLE CANCER
Cancer is perhaps the most feared disease on Earth since more and more people find out that the treatments offered for it in modern hospitals – surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy – seem to help only a small percentage of people who, in most cases, suffer from crippling mutilations and burns (from surgery and radiation), or severe, often life threatening, side effects from the poisonous chemicals used for chemotherapy.
Don’t despair! There is still hope for you!
Even if your doctor sends you home to die perhaps telling you “We have done everything we know, there is nothing else we have to offer to help you, except letting you die in peace”.
Did you ever wonder that before about 1900, cancer was a rare disease and that in some parts of the world there is NO CANCER at all? Research that goes back to Dr Otto von Warburg in the 1920s revealed the true nature of cancer and Dr A. Keith Brewer since the 1950, in part through investigation of cancer-free populations, formulated an effective treatment for cancer. This treatment was applied to many cancer patients and further enhanced by Dr Sartori since1980.
Almost all cancers in over 700 patients treated so far with this enhanced high pH therapy, responded within a few days and with I.V. application, daily shrinking of tumors between 1.0 and 2.0 cm can be expected. The only discomfort from this treatment comes from a “healing crisis” reaction that leaves you, after some initial discomfort, feeling better after a few hours or, at most, a day or two. How does this all work? Dr von Warburg found that cancer cells, like plant cells, function without oxygen and thus are very sensitive to oxygen and very strong alkaline elements. Because of the lack of oxygen, cancer cells break down their fuel, glucose, to lactic acid. This causes cancer cells to become acidic (i.e., the pH in the cancer cell is lowered to 6.8, even 5.8) which, in turn, causes them to grow out of control. Alkaline elements, particularly cesium, but also rubidium and potassium can freely enter cancer cells (but not normal cells) causing them to become alkaline or raise the pH in the cancer cell. This raised pH slows down the cancer growth and at a pH of 8.0 all cancer cell growth stops and the cancer cells either die or are turned into normal cells. While we all depend on oxygen to survive, cancer cells die if exposed to oxygen and, particularly, its most powerful form, ozone. People who live very long are free of cancer, is a fact that prompted Dr Brewer to investigate their nutrition and found that their diet contains the alkaline elements cesium (Cs), rubidium (Rb), and potassium (K), and other nutrients that were found to reduce the cancer incidence such as zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), molybdenum (Mo), vanadium (V), and the vitamins A, C and E, as well as amygdalins from apricot pits. After extensive studies of cancer cell cultures, Dr Brewer found the following: Zinc and selenium attach to the cancer cell membrane and make it easier for the cesium and rubidium to enter the cancer cells. Vitamins A and C are weak acids that attract these elements to the inside of cancer cells. Magnesium (Mg) and calcium (Ca) that normally transport the oxygen into cells are depleted in cancer cells. These and other findings were the basis for Dr Brewer to formulate the high pH therapy for cancer. His method was enhanced in the 1980s by adding I.V. ozone (which is the most active form of oxygen), herbal combinations, and other modalities, which made it even more effective.
Up to 98% of animals with cancers were cured by Dr Brewer’s high pH therapy.
Tests on mice fed cesium and rubidium showed marked shrinkage in the tumor masses of abdominal implants of mammary tumors (”breast cancers”) within 2 weeks. In addition, the mice showed none of the side effects of cancer. Cesium chloride, zinc gluconate and vitamin A were used together to alter growth of colon cancer implants in mice and the use of these compounds was responsible for the disappearance of tumors in 98% of the animals. Sarcoma I implants in mice and Novikoff hepatoma in rats disappeared if the proper ratio between cesium and potassium was maintained. With Dr Brewer’s complete protocol, using cesium (&/or rubidium), potassium & magnesium, vitamins A, C, & E, zinc, selenium, & amygdaline, there was a prompt reduction of all tumors treated by Dr Sartori including lymphomas in cats and dogs, skin cancers in dogs, cancers of the mammary glands, mouth , and esophagus in horses, and cancers of unknown primary in chickens.
Like with all “nutritional” treatments, the principle of the weakest link of the chain holds true, and if even one essential nutrient is lacking, the treatment may fail. In virtually all of over 700 patients with different types of cancer, the enhanced high pH therapy was effective in reducing the tumor mass. Over 90% of these patients were terminal with extensive metastasis and had received maximum conventional cancer treatments. Malignancies treated with this protocol included cancers of the lungs, liver (& gallbladder), pancreas, breast, prostate, colon & rectum, stomach, brain, cervix & uterus, ovaries, testicles, adrenals, kidneys & bladder, of unknown primary, rectovaginal, etc., as well as lymphomas & leukemias, melanomas, & sarcomas & bone. The results with the LSU/ULS Cancer treatment in 100 cancers are detailed in the attached articles. Summary of and Comments on the LSU (now ULS) Cancer Treatment Results. There are several factors that should be pointed out with regard to the data summarized in Table I
(a) Out of over 500 cancer patients treated from 1980 to 1987, only 97 fulfilled the criteria of having been followed up for at least 5 years or until their death. This might negatively bias the number of patients that have died by a factor of up to five since almost all of the over 500 patients were followed for at least 3 months.
(b) According to Arlin J. Brown (AJB), cancer survival statistics as published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) are not point-to-point, but are determined from the number that can be located 5 years after being diagnosed with cancer (and not even the beginning their first treatment, e.g., at) at NIH/NCI. In cancers with high mortality such as small cell lung cancers (1.0% 5-year survival according to NCI) and pancreas cancers (3.0% 5-year survival according to NCI), AJB found point-to-point survival rates of less than 0.01% and less than 0.05% respectively (perhaps because >99% of the patients had died so long ago that they could not be located anymore).
(c) By far, the majority of the patients seem at LSU were using our therapy as their last resort after all other treatments (both conventional & alternative) had been unsuccessful and most patients were simply sent home to die.
(d) In view of the extremely unfavorable patient population as outlined under (a) through (c), we believe that the results of the LSU treatment are quite remarkable and by far the best offered anywhere in the world.
(e) For reasons beyond the control of the authors, only about 200 cancer patients were treated from 1988 through 2003. In all of these patients, ozone and the minerals and vitamins were applied intravenously (I.V.). The I.V. application of minerals and vitamins proved to be a dramatic improvement in that (i) in virtually all cases, the size/diameter of all fastgrowing tumors was reduced by 1.0 to 2.0 cm (0.4 to 0.8 inches) per day, i.e., a disappearance of a 5.0 cm (2 inch) tumor within four days and of a 10 cm (4 inch) tumor within eight days, and (ii) virtually none of the patients showed any of the side effects frequently encountered with oral vitamin/mineral application such as nausea, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, possible aggravation of ulcer symptoms, and sometimes even vomiting.
After several cancer patients were successfully treated at the Integrated Medical Center in Northern Virginia from April to July 1998, from mid 1998 until mid2003, government agencies and law enforcement in the U.S.A. virtually completely suppressed the use of the enhanced high–pH cancer therapy by LSU/ULS, and this treatment can now only be offered offshore and far removed from these agencies.
RESULTS WITH THE LSU/ULS TREATMENT PROGRAM FOR CANCER
(broken down into the most frequent types/locations of cancers treated) 1. Lung Cancers Of the 18 lung cancers described in this study (of a total of >100), 14 were connected to active smoking, two to passive smoking, one to radon exposure in the home, and one to cadmium exposure at the workplace. Asbestos may have been a factor in one of the active smokers, radon in the home in one of the passive smokers.
Beta-carotene, vitamin A, selenium, and vitamin E from green and yellow vegetables are now recognized as clearly preventative of lung cancer. These vegetables were conspicuously absent from the diet of most of our lung cancer patients. Instead, most of them were eating a meat and potato diet before they started the LSU cancer treatment program. Histologically, 4 patients had epidermoid cancers, 3 had adenocarcinomas, 8 had small cell carcinomas, 2 had large cell carcinomas, and in 2 patients the histologic type was unknown; two of the small cell carcinoma patients also had a lymphoma. All patients had received the full course of orthodox treatment: 6 had surgical resections (3 of the epidermoid-, and one each of the adeno-, small cell-, and large cell carcinomas). All patients had received chemotherapy, and the 6 surgical patients also had received radiation. At the beginning of the treatment, four of the patients were dying on a stretcher, four could walk only with assistance, six were given a prognosis of less than 6 months of survival, and in 4, the prognosis was unknown. The 2 patients with unknown histology who came in dying on a stretcher nevertheless survived 13 and 20 days respectively. The third of the dying patients, with an epidermoid cancer, survived almost 3 months until he died from internal bleeding from an extremely low platelet count. The fourth of the dying patients survived over 5 years and was well in July 1992; he had a small cell carcinoma that generally has less than 1% chance of 5 year survival (less than 0.01% according to Arlin J. Brown). One of the two small cell carcinoma patients who also had a lymphoma is alive and well without any sign of cancer over 10 years after he was barely able to walk into the office with assistance. He is now in excellent health and successfully runs a medical equipment company. The other unfortunately died in a hit-and-run car accident 10 months beyond his given life expectancy and without any sign of cancer at autopsy. One of the adenocarcinoma patients who came in, walking with assistance, responded well for about 2 weeks, then continuously deteriorated, and died after 4 months. The fourth walk-assist patient, with a large cell cancer was treated 4 times and died after 1 year and 8 months. Of the 6 patients who were given fewer than 6 months to live, one epidermoid cancer patient died from cardiac failure after 3 years and 4 months, one of the small cell cancer patients with terminal emphysema died from a combination of pulmonary failure and bronchopneumonia; one patient with adenocarcinoma received 6 treatment series and died from his cancer after 3 years and 8 months; one small cell cancer patient died after 2 years 5 months, one after 4 years 1 month, one epidermoid cancer patient died after 3 years 3 months. One of the factors in the deaths of these patients may have been that at the time of their treatments, the LSU mental reconditioning program (MRP) was far less developed. By using the full, presently available LSU MRP, perhaps at least two, maybe even four of these patients could have been helped. Of the lung cancer patients who survived over five years, four had a small cell cancer, one had a large cell, and one had an epidermoid cancer. 2. Lymphomas Of the 13 lymphomas described in this study (of a total of >60), 9 were lymphocytic (3 males had AIDS, one male had severe rheumatoid arthritis, and one was a Klinefelter syndrome; 4 were females), one female had Hodgkin lymphoma, one male had a T-cell lymphoma, and in 2 males, the histology was not determined. Three patients were dying, 4 needed ambulatory assistance partially because of their enormous tumors, and 3 were given less than a year to live. One of the dying patients with lymphoma of unknown histology died after 17 days from cardiac toxicity of chemotherapy. Another of them, an AIDS patient, died after 7 weeks from aplastic anemia from combined chemotherapies for infections and the lymphoma, given to the patient prior to his coming to LSU. No signs of lymphoma were detected at time of death. One 37 year old dying woman has survived over 10 years without any sign of recurrence after only one series of the LSU treatment.
Of the 4 patients who needed assistance with walking, one AIDS patient is alive and well for over 8 years, has turned HIV negative at the end of one treatment series and his T4 cell count rose from 124 with a T4/T8 ratio of 0.36 to between 1,100 and 1,300 with a T4/T8 ratio between 1.5 and 1.8 for the last 4 years. Within one month, his nodal lymphomas disappeared and none of his previous CNS involvement was detected anymore on a CAT scan. One patient had a huge hemispheric protrusion of his abdomen, very similar to a patient described in Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., Vol. 21, Suppl. 1, pp. 11-13, 1984. His total tumor mass was estimated to be about 37 kg with about 40 liters of ascites. Within 3 weeks both tumor and ascites were reduced to approximately one half, within 2 months there was only a slight enlargement of the spleen of about 5 cm. The patient survived for over five years without any sign of tumor recurrence. The two patients who had both lymphoma and lung cancer were already discussed under 1.; one of them is alive and well, the other died 10 months after treatment in a hitand- run accident. He had shown no signs of cancer at autopsy. One of the 3 patients who were given less than a year to live, unexpectedly died from a heart attack 10 months after initial treatment. Another died after 3 years and 7 months and did not respond to treatments, except for the initial series. The third patient survived for over 5 years without sign of tumor recurrence. The woman with Hodgkin lymphoma died from aplastic anemia, a complication of her previously received chemotherapy, 1 year and 2 months after treatment onset. The patient with the T-cell lymphoma had come all the way from Osaka, Japan and seemed to respond well to the first treatment series. He returned 5 months later, showed barely any response to the treatment, and died 11 months after the initial visit. Language problems may have been a contributing factor to his death, since we were not sure, whether he and his family had completely understood our instructions. 3. Liver Cancers Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or malignant hepatoma is one of the most common malignancies in the world and it is estimated to be responsible for up to 1,300,000 deaths every year. In portions of Africa and Asia, HCC is the most common malignant tumor. It occurs infrequently in the U.S., North and South America, and Europe where it accounts for about 2% of the malignancies. The incidence of HCC is especially high in China, Taiwan, Mozambique, and Singapore. Risk factors of HCC include chronic toxic hepatic injury (20 to 60% in N&S America), cirrhosis (60 to 90% worldwide), chronic hepatitis B infection (20 to 90% worldwide), aflatoxin (especially in Africa and Asia, e.g. from peanut oil), alcoholism, chronic hepatic outflow obstruction (CHOO; 20% in South Africa, 60+% in Japan), male gender (5:1 in high incidence areas, 2:1 in low incidence areas), Asian or Black ancestry (or rather dietary habits). Of the 12 patients listed as having liver cancer (of a total of >50), 8 had primary HCC, 3 had extensive liver metastasis from an occult primary malignancy (OPM), and one patient had intrahepatic biliary cancer (IHBC).The 8 patients with HCC had elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and reduction of AFP below 100 mg/mL was interpreted as an indication of tumor disappearance. Using a cutoff for serum levels of 10 ng/mL, AFP is sensitive for HCC in 70 to 90%. Patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis tend to have elevated AFP levels of usually under 200 ng/mL. Levels of 400 to 1,000 ng/mL are diagnostic for HCC. AFP is also elevated in yolk sac tumors and in a high proportion of other germ cell tumors.
The patient with IHBC and the 3 patients with liver metastasis from OPM had elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the range of 55 to 185 ng/mL at their admission to the LSU cancer treatment program. No colorectal cancer or other primary malignancy was ever found. Elevated CEA levels are found in patients with gastrointestinal, pancreatic, breast, lung, thyroid medullary, and genitourinary carcinomas, as well as in benign disorders including inflammatory bowel disease, cirrhosis of the liver, pancreatitis, and pneumonia. Normal values for CEA are up to 2.5 ng/mL, in smokers up to 5.0 ng/mL. Benign disorders seldom elevate the CEA level above 10 ng/mL. Reduction of CEA levels below 5 ng/mL was interpreted as an indication of tumor disappearance. Of the 12 liver cancer patients, 3 were dying, 3 needed assistance when walking, and 4 were given life expectancies of less than 6 months. 9 had undergone surgery, including the 3 OPM and the IHBC patients; 5 had suffered radiation treatment, and all 12 had been exposed no massive chemotherapy. One female HCC patient, a 32-year-old fitness instructor, had been first seen in the office of a world famous diet doctor in New York City, where she almost died on the table from an imbalanced vitamin-mineral IV. Through almost a miracle she made it to Washington, D.C., lying on a stretcher in the station wagon driven by her husband. Within 2 weeks her massively enlarged liver that had extended over 14 cm below the normal in a scalloped curve that filled about two-thirds of her abdomen, had returned to normal. Her AFP test came down from 2,420 ng/L to 120 ng/mL within 24 weeks. She was well until about 4 years later when she died in a car crash. Unfortunately, the diet doctor never referred any other cancer patient to the LSU clinics. Four more of the HCC patients, and one of the OPM patients, responded very well and survived over 8 years after their initial treatment without signs of recurrence, with AFP and CEA below the cutoff points of 100 ng/mL and 5.0 ng/mL respectively. One HCC patient died from the side effects of chemotherapy within 2 weeks, another within 2 months; one OPM patient shared the same fate after fewer than 3 months. The IHCP survived 2 years and 4 months, after responding moderately well to 3 courses of the LSU cancer treatment. 4. Pancreas Cancer The tumor-associated carbohydrate antigen, CA 19-9, detects about 80% of all pancreatic cancers correctly, compared with 8% of patients with pancreatitis and 1% false positive normal patients. The pancreatic adenocarcinoma glycoprotein, DU-PAN-2,. detects up to 55% of all pancreatic cancers, though in may also be elevated in patients with biliary cirrhosis, gastric cancer, and biliary cancer. In all of our 11 pancreatic cancer patients(of a total of >50), either CA 19-9, DU-PAN-2, or both markers were elevated to a range of 850 to 950 U/mL for CA 19-9, and 300 to 1,200 U/mL for DU-PAN-2 at admission, and reductions of serum levels below 70 or 120 U/mL, respectively, were considered as evidence of disappearance of the tumor. CA 19-9 antigen (detectable by a murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody against a human colon carcinoma cell line) is elevated in 55 to 90% of stomach cancers, 80% of pancreatic cancers, and about 95% of colorectal cancers; in advanced pancreatic cancers it is elevated in 80-90%. In benign disorders including acute pancreatic, hepatobiliary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease, CA 19-9 usually does not exceed 100 U/mL. Normal values of CA 19-9 are up to 36 U/mL. DU-PAN-2 is a mucin-type glycoprotein antigen selected for reactivity against human pancreatic carcinoma cells (detectable by murine monoclomal antibodies). Increased levels occur in many diseases of the liver and hepatobiliary tree including primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis, hepatitis, cirrhosis, and benign hepatomas, and usually do not exceed 200 U/mL. DU-PAN-2 may also be elevated in biliary and gastric cancer, and in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Normal DU-PAN-2 values are up to 60 U/mL. Histologically 10 of the 11 patients had an adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, one had an intrapancreatic bile duct carcinoma (IPDC) that was diagnosed intraoperatively. One patient had both stomach and pancreatic cancer. Eight of the patients had undergone resections and/or exploratory surgery, 10 had suffered from radiation, and all 11 had been given massive doses of chemotherapy.
At the onset of the LSU treatment,
one patient was dying, 3 needed walking assistance, and 6 were given fewer than 6 months to live.
Two patients died from the side effects of chemotherapy within less than 3 weeks including the patient with IPDC. One other succumbed from chemotherapy side effects after 10 weeks. One patient died after about 10 months from an internal bleeding probably not related to cancer. The patient with stomach and pancreatic cancer did not respond well to 3 treatment courses. Nevertheless, they prolonged his life from an expected less than one month to 1 year and 7 months. One patient died after 3 years and 2 months, another after 3 years and 11 months. Nevertheless, the treatment had extended their life expectancy of less than 6 months. Four of the 11 patients survived more than 5 years which compares favorably with a reported 5-year survival rate of pancreas cancer patients of 3% (or less than 0.01% according to Arlin J. Brown). 5. Breast Cancer Six of the nine breast cancer patients (of a total of >40), who are discussed in this report were terminal with widespread metastatic disease, one of them dying, two of them needing walking assistance, and another three with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. In all cases, any detectable primary tumors or metastatic skin tumors either disappeared within 2 weeks or turned from hard, knobby, scalloped, infiltrative cancerous growths into much smaller well-defined, round, and much softer benign cysts with a smooth surface. Unfortunately, two months after treatment onset, one patient died of cardiac failure from doxorubicin toxicity, and one patient died from acute pericarditis-myocarditis from cyclophosphamide less than 3 weeks after treatment was started. One patient responded well to the first treatment course, but had a recurrence after 3 months, and died from pneumonitis. It is possible that an ill-advised treatment course with bleomycin may have contributed to her demise. One patient, a former heavy smoker aged 57 when her treatment began, died after 2 years and 11 months from a myocardial infarction. 5-fluorouracil treatment may also have contributed to her premature death. Another patient who responded poorly to the treatment nevertheless survived 2 years and 2 months, more than 2 years longer than she expected before she started the LSU treatment. The remaining 4 patients survived over 5 years without any sign of recurrence. 6. Prostate Cancers Six of the 8 prostate cancer patients in this study (of a total of >40), had extensive metastatic disease, one of them was dying, two needed assistance with walking, and 4 were given less than 6 months to live. All patients showed elevated levels of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) that ranged from 35 to 235 ng/mL at admission (Normal PSA < 4.0 ng/mL). In benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), PSA levels <25 ng/mL are seen. PSA is false negative in about 15% of the prostate cancers. The cutoff point for the disappearance of the cancer was set at 10 ng/mL. Very similar to the results in breast cancer patients, all palpable infiltrating tumor masses in all patients either disappeared or turned into benign, well-defined, cystic tumors of much smaller size. The dying patient succumbed to the side-effects of his chemotherapy 20 days after the beginning of his treatment. One of the severely debilitated patients died after 9 weeks also as a consequence of his chemotherapy. Two patients only partially responded to the treatment. One of these died in a horseback riding accident, the other died after 4 treatment courses 2 years and 5 months after he started the LSU cancer treatment. He had survived almost 2 years longer than was originally expected.
Four patients survived at least 5 years, two of them needed only one treatment course, one of them needed two, and the fourth needed four treatment courses. Their PSA levels were maintained below 10 ng/mL after their treatments were completed. 7. Colorectal Cancers Of the 6 patients in this study with colorectal cancers (of a total of >50), all had elevated values of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the range of 80 to 280 ng/mL, indicative of widespread metastatic disease; all of them had undergone surgical resections, 4 with colostomy, and 2 without colostomy. All 6 had received a full course of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and a variety of other chemotherapeutics. Two of the patients received radiation therapy. The response of these patients to the LSU treatment program was not as impressive as for instance, in the case of liver cancer patients. Only the 2 patients without colostomy survived more than five years after 2 and 3 LSU treatment courses respectively. In both cases, the CEA was maintained below 5.0 ng/mL. One of the colostomy patients died from a heart attack after a good initial response to the treatment in the 11th week of his treatment. 5-FU-induced myocardial ischemia may have been a contributing factor. Another of the colostomy patients apparently died from a barbiturate overdose, possibly a suicide attempt. It should be noted that over 35 of the colostomy patients were lost in the follow-up. The two patients who had suffered abdominal radiation had severe problems with adhesions and fistulas. Both had severe diarrhea at admission that was controlled with diet within about 2 to 3 weeks. Though both had a life expectancy of less than 3 months at the time of admission, they survived for 2 years and 7 months, and 3 years and 3 months, respectively. Their CEA levels returned to below 5.0 ng/mL after 3 months and stayed there until their deaths. 8. Uterine Cervical Cancers All 6 patients in this study (of a total of>30) had undergone radical hysterectomies and pelvic lymphadenectomies, multiple radiation treatments, and full courses of chemotherapy (4 patients received a combination of doxorubicin and methotrexate; 4 patients received mitomycine, vincristine, and bleomycin; one patient had been given both combinations). One patient died after 2 years and 20 months after undergoing 4 courses of the LSU treatment. Originally she was given less than 3 months to live. One patient fell down a flight of stars, fractured her neck and died with hours. She had survived 3 years and 5 months. Her original life expectancy was less than one year. Two patients survived 5 years and had no indication of tumor recurrence on CAT scans and NMR imaging. For the normalization of abnormal Papanicolaou (PAP) smears [Group 2: Infections; Group 4: squamous cell CA; Group 5: adenocarcinoma; Group 6: nonepithelial malignancy] and even of Stage O (Carcinoma in situ) through Stage IA2 (strictly confined to cervix; depth: £5 mm, spread: £7 mm), cervical cancers, topical application of folic acid in conjunction with vaginal ozone application has been found virtually 100% effectivein about 30 patients. Vaginal ozone applications are also an effective prevention of cervical cancers since it removes HPV and other pathogens that are causing chronic cervicitis that may turn malignant. 9. Brain Cancers All 4 brain cancer patients (of a total of about 15) had highly malignant extensive glioblastomas. All 4 had undergone surgery and radiation, as well as glucocorticoid therapy. Two of the patients were unconscious at admission. The two conscious patients complained about headaches, especially in the morning, loss of appetite, nausea, loss of concentration, reduced mental capacity, and increased sleepiness. In both, personality changes were clearly evident.
After treatment onset both unconscious patients regained consciousness within 3 days and were able to say simple sentences within 5 and 8 days respectively. One of these patients suddenly deteriorated in the 4th week, possibly from malnutrition. His sister, who supervised his feeding, had failed to properly follow our instructions. When we found out that there was a problem, the patient was already beyond recovery. The other patient recovered well enough to return to his job as a real estate broker, and has survived 5 years without sign of recurrence. Both of the two conscious patients had a lethal car accident; one about 2-1/2 years, the other about 3-1/2 years after their treatments. Both accidents may have been related to personality and psychomotor changes caused by their original tumors. 10. Melanomas The three patients with melanoma in this study (of a total of about 12) all had widespread metastatic disease. They all responded well to the first course of treatment though less favorably to further treatment courses. One of the patients died after 11 months. She had originally been given less than one month to live. Another patient who had been given less than 6 months to live survived 2 years and 10 months. One of the patients, a black woman who had undergone 5 courses of treatment, survived 5 years without sign of malignancy. 11. Other Cancers The number of the 10 remaining tumors in this study (of a total remaining of >80), two ovarian cancers, two stomach cancers (one of which was combined with a pancreatic cancer; see under 4.), one osteosarcoma, one soft tissue sarcoma, two kidney cancers, one bladder cancer, and one adrenal cancer, is too small to allow any clear judgment of the effectiveness of the LSU treatment in these specific cancers. In all cases, a prompt response was seen in the first treatment course. One kidney cancer patient died after 20 days as a consequence of his chemotherapy. The other kidney cancer patient responded moderately well to the LSU treatment and died after 4 years and one month (well over 5 years after his original diagnosis & thus “cured” according to NCI statistics,). The stomach cancer patient who also had pancreas cancer is described above under 4. He died after 1 year and 3 months. The other-stomach cancer patient responded moderately well to consecutive LSU treatments and died after 4 years and 2 months (rather than after less than one year ; & would also be listed by NCI as “cured”). One ovarian cancer patient responded well and survived over 5 years. The other responded moderately well to consecutive LSU treatments and survived 3 years and 10 months.The bladder cancer patient did not respond well and died after 11-1/2 months (rather than after less than 1 month). The adrenal cancer did well, needed only one LSU treatment course, and survived over 5 years without sign of recurrence. Continued next page
The 200 Plus Cancers Treated from 1987 through 2003 The following are only general remarks since on 2 May 1992, U.S Government Agents simultaneously broke into three locations where the originals and two copies of some 3000 patient records treated by LSU from 1980 through 1992, including about 650 cancer patients, about 180 AIDS patients, about 80 multiple sclerosis patients, and over 2000 patients with different conditions that were the data basis for the 2d ed. of the Ozone Book that for reasons beyond the control of the authors took until the year 2004 to be finally completed. . Again, we see a prevalence of “incurable” cancers (a) which have 0.0% success rate and thus should NOT be treated conventionally at all, including, small cell lung, pancreas, & esophagus cancers, acute adult leukemias, and all cancers with widespread metastasis; (b) malignancies where conventional treatment in almost all cases shortens the life span, including, stomach, brain, liver, & most ovarian cancers, multiple myeloma & chronic adult leukemias, as well as large (>10 cm = >2″) fast growing cancers with lymph node metastasis; (c) cancers with the highest incidence (in the USA & Western Europe), including, (female) breast, prostate, lungs[see (a)], & colon, where with early detection there is about 50% 5-year survival in breast, of 60% in prostate, & about 25% in colon cancers, that drops precipitously to some 10% if (b) & 1.0% if (a), supra, conditions are present; (d) other cancers including non-Hodgkin lymphomas, cancers of the urinary bladder & kidneys, rectum, (epi/naso)pharynx & oral cavity, endometrium & uterine cervix, & melanomas of the skin, rectovaginal cancer, larynx & thyroid cancer, Ewing sarcoma, etc. [which includes all 20 most frequent cancers in Thailand]. The estimated overall 5-year survival rate of all of these cancer patients, almost all of them terminal with widespread metastasis [see (a)] & [seeking our treatment only] after all conventional treatments had been exhausted, was ~40%, which increased to ~50% if they survived the first 3 weeks after treatment onset, & to ~60% if they survived 3 months after treatment onset, even more, ~80%, if they had a chance to have follow-up treatments at LSU, which was denied to virtually all patients after 17 July 1998 & until mid-2003, and many of which would be alive today; and while the estimated 5 year survival of untreated [with conventional methods: surgery &/or radiation &/or chemotherapy, etc.] patients was about 95% if they kept in touch with LSU/ULS, had a purpose to their lives with goals they absolutely needed to achieve, no matter what, meticulously maintained their alkalinizing blood-type-specific supplementation/diet/lifestyle, & balanced mind/ body/spirit as practitioners of Taoist Energy Healing, Silva Mind Control, & Neurolinguistic Programming
Posted 12/8/2009 11:56:00 AM
December 8, 2009
NaturalNews) Although a number of studies have recently implicated a synthetic form of insulin in an increased risk of cancer, the FDA has urged patients to keep taking the drug.
"Based on the currently available data, the FDA recommends that patients should not stop taking their insulin therapy without consulting a physician, since uncontrolled blood sugar levels can have both immediate and long-term serious adverse effects," the FDA said.
Out of four studies on the issue recently published in the journal Diabetologia, three found that the synthetic insulin analogue Lantus (generic name insulin glargine), manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis, significantly increased patients' risk of several kinds of malignant tumor.
In addition to appealing to the risks that diabetics face without taking insulin, the FDA sought to cast doubt on the validity of the new studies.
"The duration of patient follow-up in all four studies was shorter than what is generally considered necessary to evaluate for cancer risk from drug exposure," the agency said. "Further, inconsistencies in findings within and across individual studies raise concerns as to whether an association between the use of insulin glargine and cancer truly exists."
However, the FDA did encourage "both health care professionals and patients to report side effects from the use of insulin glargine to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program."
The American Diabetes Association also urged patients to keep taking their insulin, but its logic was slightly different than the FDA's, in that it acknowledged that insulin treatment might increase cancer risk.
"For patients using glargine and considering switching to another form of insulin, the data in these studies make it unclear as to whether any one type of insulin increases the risk of cancer more than other types of insulin," the association said. "Patients concerned about these studies or their insulin regimen should talk to their doctor and should not stop taking their insulin on the basis of the findings reported here."
Sources for this story include: www.ajc.com.
Posted 12/8/2009 11:50:00 AM