Hi Kristi,

I've noticed that the text I've sent in earlier lost all the line-breaks, etc. Here it is again with some HTML tags:

Timeline of events:

April 2009: mammography

June 2009: ultrasound/MRI/biopsy/second opinion --> diagnosed with malignant breast cancer (two tumors in right breast, one 11mm x 8mm the other 6.5mm x 6.5mm), adviced urgently to have a mastectomy the next week. One day before the planned operation we found out about a new theory of disease: German New Medicine (GNM) and put the operation on hold in order to find out more about this.

July 2009: canceled the rescheduled operation (30th July 2009) and stepped away from conventional therapy (surgery/chemo/radiation) altogether. We found the conflict which, according to GNM, 'caused' my girlfriend's breast cancer and solved it (actually, it turned out that this conflict got solved more or less automatically by a itself - change of circumstances, which often accurs to people and which could explain why about 22-30% of malignant breast cancer disappears when not discovered and thus remains untreated: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/27canc.html?_r=1)

August 2009: found out about B17 and started my girlfriend on a special diet containing apricot kernels (along with pancreatic enzymes, zinc, magnesium, etc.) as some kind of 'backup plan' - we still look at GNM as a theory that explains the cause of cancer and other 'diseases', and B17 - and other 'metabolic therapies' - as a product that destroys cancer cells, but doesn't remove the cause of cancer, which is mostly prolonged agitation, stress, conflict, trauma, fear, etc.

September 2009: a ultrasound was taken at the same hospital where the mammography took place (April 2009) and the radiologist was not very friendly when he read that we refused conventional therapy. The result: no significant change compared with the ultrasound taken in July 2009. After taking a look at the images (on the CD we got from them) I decided we should have another ultrasound, which we did three days later, at another town. The radiologist there didn't know that we refused conventional treatment (this time, the reference letter from our doctor did not mention this fact, it only mentioned 'follow up ultrasound'). Much to our surprise he told my girlfriend that everything looked fine. After we told him about the ultrasound from 3 days earlier, he wanted to have another look, but in the end he had to admit that the tumors were gone!

January 2010: Another ultrasound was taken by the same radiologist who assured us that their was no sign of the ultrasound images found in June 2009 (and the beginning of September, according to the radiologist from the clinic where the first ultrasound was taken). This time it was a different story, because now our doctor inclosed the results of the examinations from June 2009 - biopsy, adviced mastectomy - and requested that the results of the new ultrasound would be sent to the oncologist/surgeon who told us to come in for a mastectomy, followed by chemo and radiation. The result: the 'known' tumors were 'not clearly visible', but there appeared to be a 'new tumorlike process' going on in the right breast. The lymph nodes were clear, as was the left breast. He told my girlfriend: "there's still something there, but then again, you already knew this."

I only found out about this when we returned home and when I called this radiologist and confronted him with his ambiguous behaviour (first he declared my girlfriend clear and now he said that she knew there was something there...) he lost his calm. He said that cancer never disappeares without conventional treatment and denied having ever said that the tumors had disappeard (September 2009). When I reminded him of the fact that he even had called our family doctor and told him too that we had nothing to worry about (he insured him that he was 100% sure about his findings) he denied this also. That's when I told him I knew enough and abruptly ended the conversation.

17 May 2010: my girlfriend still feels fine (never felt so good, actually) and there's no visible nor palpable signs of any kind that something might be wrong with her. In fact, the only pain she ever experienced was caused by the double core-biopsy they took June 2009 (the stinging pain was situated at the points of entry of the, not so tin, needle and at one time was eradiated to her right shoulder). This pain has faded away more and more and at this time is as good as gone.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to send me message. My girlfriend picked up her life again, soon after we discovered the GNM theory and started working again October 2009. She's not into talking about this experience as she counts on me to take care of things (she calls me her 'therapeutist' and feels that any questions should be directed to me). I agree, because most people can't - or won't - believe that cancer can be overcome without 'proper treatment' (meaning surgery/chemo/radiation). And the last thing she needs is the negativity surrounding the so called scientifically orientated (read: conditioned/brainwashed) nonbelievers.

One last thing: we feel strongly that without God's help (or atleast a believe in a 'higher power') real healing isn't possible.

God bless